ProductAccuracyPricingComparePartnershipsResources
Sign inBook a demo

Audience simulation grounded in observed behavior, not synthetic panels.

Made by Social Intelligence Labs

Product

  • Product
  • Accuracy
  • Pricing
  • Compare

Resources

  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Docs
  • API
  • Changelog

Company

  • About
  • Partnerships
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookies
  • Data ethics

Test it before you post it.

Test your website, ads and ideas on audiences built from real people.

Book a demoCreate an account

© 2026 Planetarium. All rights reserved.

Compare/October 27, 2026

Planetarium vs Simile

Choose Planetarium for self-serve tests of creative, messages and websites at a published price. Choose Simile for enterprise simulations of individuals with a confidence label on each result.

By the Planetarium team · We publish this page and sell in this category

Key takeaways

  • Planetarium: half of studies in about 34 seconds. Simile: not published (their Itaú case went from 5 weeks to 4 days).
  • Planetarium starts at $99 a month, first test free. Simile publishes no price.
  • Simile reports matched people's answers 85% as well as people matched their own when asked again, from an academic paper by its founders. Planetarium was right 87 times in 100 when it names a winner (575 of 660). Different tests, so not one ranking.

What is Simile?

A foundation model of human behavior that simulates how customers, employees or populations respond to change. It is built for enterprises in consumer, finance, travel, media, health and telecoms.

Populations that start from real people, trained on daily studies, purchase data and AI-led voice interviews; a second model labels each result's confidence.

How do Planetarium and Simile compare?

Row by row, from each company’s own pages. Where one publishes nothing on a point, the row says so.

  • What it does

    Planetarium

    Test ads, messages, surveys and live websites on audiences built from real people observed online; their answers are simulated.

    Simile

    A foundation model of human behavior that simulates how customers, employees or populations respond to change.
  • Built for

    Planetarium

    Agencies, brand and marketing teams, research and insights, product and growth teams

    Simile

    Enterprises in consumer, finance, travel, media, health and telecoms
  • Where the audiences come from

    Planetarium

    Audiences built from people observed on social platforms, grouped by what they engage with; their answers are simulated

    Simile

    Populations that start from real people, trained on daily studies, purchase data and AI-led voice interviews; a second model labels each result's confidence
  • How you buy

    Planetarium

    Self-serve by card: Starter $99, Pro $399, Growth $999 a month. First test free.

    Simile

    No price on the site.
  • Time to a result

    Planetarium

    Half of studies in about 34 seconds

    Simile

    Not published (their Itaú case went from 5 weeks to 4 days)
  • Published accuracy

    Planetarium

    Right 87 times in 100 when it names a winner (575 of 660)own test1,500 published news-headline A/B tests (Upworthy, 2013 to 2015), held out and scored once (October 2026). It named a winner on 660 and called the other 840 too close. Headlines only

    Simile

    Matched people's answers 85% as well as people matched their own when asked againacademic paperA 2024 Stanford study of 1,000 people; the company also reports over 7,000 evaluations and a per-result confidence label
  • API

    Planetarium

    API, plus MCP for AI agents, on Growth and Enterprise

    Simile

    Not described
  • Run it yourself

    Planetarium

    Yes

    Simile

    Not described
  • Real people take part

    Planetarium

    No, simulated answers

    Simile

    No, simulated answers
Planetarium and Simile, side by side
 PlanetariumSimile
What it doesTest ads, messages, surveys and live websites on audiences built from real people observed online; their answers are simulated.A foundation model of human behavior that simulates how customers, employees or populations respond to change.
Built forAgencies, brand and marketing teams, research and insights, product and growth teamsEnterprises in consumer, finance, travel, media, health and telecoms
Where the audiences come fromAudiences built from people observed on social platforms, grouped by what they engage with; their answers are simulatedPopulations that start from real people, trained on daily studies, purchase data and AI-led voice interviews; a second model labels each result's confidence
How you buySelf-serve by card: Starter $99, Pro $399, Growth $999 a month. First test free.No price on the site.
Time to a resultHalf of studies in about 34 secondsNot published (their Itaú case went from 5 weeks to 4 days)
Published accuracyRight 87 times in 100 when it names a winner (575 of 660)own test1,500 published news-headline A/B tests (Upworthy, 2013 to 2015), held out and scored once (October 2026). It named a winner on 660 and called the other 840 too close. Headlines onlyMatched people's answers 85% as well as people matched their own when asked againacademic paperA 2024 Stanford study of 1,000 people; the company also reports over 7,000 evaluations and a per-result confidence label
APIAPI, plus MCP for AI agents, on Growth and EnterpriseNot described
Run it yourselfYesNot described
Real people take partNo, simulated answersNo, simulated answers

From Simile's own pages, listed under Sources, and ours. Read October 27, 2026.

How accurate is Simile?

Matched people's answers 85% as well as people matched their own when asked again. The figure comes from an academic paper by its founders: a 2024 Stanford study of 1,000 people; the company also reports over 7,000 evaluations and a per-result confidence label.

Planetarium was right 87 times in 100 when it names a winner (575 of 660), on 1,500 published news-headline A/B tests (Upworthy, 2013 to 2015), held out and scored once (October 2026). It named a winner on 660 and called the other 840 too close. Headlines only. The full record is on the accuracy page.

When is Simile the better choice?

  • You need a simulation of individuals, and a confidence label on each result.
  • You are rehearsing an earnings call, a policy change or a litigation outcome.
  • You want a custom model trained on your own data.

When should you choose Planetarium?

  • You want to test creative, messages, surveys or a website yourself, today.
  • You want a published price and your first test free.
  • You want an API or MCP for your own tools (Growth plan, $999 a month).

How much does Simile cost?

No price on the site.

Planetarium is self-serve by card: Starter $99, Pro $399, Growth $999 a month. First test free. See pricing.

How was this page made?

We publish this page and sell in this category. Every claim about another company comes from that company’s own public pages, or a paper or partner report it cites, read on October 27, 2026, and each is listed below. Where a company publishes nothing on a point, the page says so; that does not mean it cannot do it.

Each company measures accuracy its own way, on its own tests, so the figures are shown side by side but never ranked as one league table. We did not trial the other products. Our own figures are the ones on our pricing and accuracy pages. Something out of date? Tell us through the contact page and we will correct it.

Frequently asked questions

Why not just ask a general AI model?

In our October 2026 test on 421 YouTube videos, Planetarium's error on the mix of comments was 15 to 27% lower than each of 6 leading models asked directly. Planetarium answers as 17,849 ready-made audiences built from people observed online, and says "too close" when it cannot tell.

How can Planetarium show a price from $99 when most here do not?

The audiences are built before you arrive, so there is no project to scope and no audience to build for you. You run the test yourself; half of studies come back in about 34 seconds. Plans start at $99 a month, first test free. Most of the others scope and price each engagement after a demo.

Can these accuracy figures be compared with each other?

Not as one ranking. Each company tests itself its own way, on its own questions, with its own measure, so a higher number on one site is not a better result than a lower one on another. Read what each figure measures, then ask each supplier to run your own past study.

Should synthetic research replace real people?

No. Use it to test many versions fast and cheaply, then take the best to real people when the decision is large. Where a decision needs real people's own words, a platform such as Remesh is the better choice.

Related comparisons

  • Simile alternatives
  • Planetarium alternatives
  • Planetarium vs Synthetic Users
  • Planetarium vs Remesh
  • Planetarium vs Minds
  • All comparisons

Sources

  1. 1Simile, Homepage (opens in a new tab). Read October 27, 2026.
  2. 2Simile, The simulation company (opens in a new tab) (February 12, 2026). Read October 27, 2026.
  3. 3Simile, Confidence (opens in a new tab) (August 25, 2026). Read October 27, 2026.
  4. 4Simile, Itaú at ESOMAR (opens in a new tab) (September 11, 2026). Read October 27, 2026.
  5. 5Park et al., Generative agent simulations of 1,000 people (opens in a new tab) (November 2024). Read October 27, 2026.

Try it

First test free

Run your first test free.

Start freeBook a demo